Search sqlserver-dba.com
Follow sqlserver-dba.com
For any SQL Server issue send email to: jack@sqlserver-dba.com
SQLServer-DBA.com Links
Recent Posts
- SQL Server 2019 upgrade considerations
- How to use Database Compatibility to increase your migration success
- How to start SSMS as a different Windows login
- How to capture SQL login details with Extended Events
- How to add members to the Administrators group with Powershell
- How to view the current Powershell session security permissions
- How to get Active Directory Group Scope - Local Domain, Global Group, Universal Group with Powershell
- How to resolve a hostname or ip address with Powershell
- How can I execute t-sql with a Proxy account
- AWS-RDS SQL Server limitations
Difference between sys.objects and sysobjects
30 May,2014 by Tom Collins
Question:What is the difference between sysobjects and sys.objects?
Answer: SQL Server Books Online is the best source of information about system tables. In summary:
1) From SQL Server 2005 , a number of system tables were implemented as compatibility views – satisfying backward compatibility. Sysobjects is an example of a backward compatibility view. Sysobjects is not a table but a view
2) The compatibility views expose the equivalent of the SQL Server 2000 metadata but don’t expose the SQL Server 2005 features metadata
3) If using new features , such as Partitioning , use sys.objects rather than compatibility views
4) In code reviews I still see wide usage of compatibility views such as sysobjects. Consider changing to the newer versions
Read More
Top 10 DBA Tips to develop your competitive edge
DBA Ignorance , complacency and arrogance experiment
Author: Tom Collins (http://www.sqlserver-dba.com)
Share:
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Posted by: |